← All quizzes
Fitness

What's Your Training Zone?

Answer 5 questions to find which heart rate zone you should be training in — and why it matters for your goals.

Question 1 of 5

What's your primary fitness goal?

A
Burn fat and lose weightMy main priority is fat loss
B
Build an aerobic baseI want better endurance and cardiovascular fitness
C
Improve performanceI want to get faster, stronger, or fitter overall
D
General health and longevityI want to stay healthy and active long-term

How would you describe your current fitness level?

A
BeginnerI exercise occasionally or am just getting started
B
ModerateI exercise 2–3 times per week consistently
C
ActiveI exercise 4–5 times per week and have been for months
D
AthleticI train regularly with a structured programme

When you do cardio, how do you typically feel during the session?

A
Breathless and working hardI push myself and feel out of breath most of the time
B
Moderately challengedI can talk but it takes some effort
C
ComfortableI can hold a full conversation without difficulty
D
It variesI mix intensities depending on the day

How often do you feel fatigued or need extra recovery after workouts?

A
OftenI frequently need a day or two to recover
B
SometimesAfter harder sessions, I need more rest
C
RarelyI usually recover overnight and feel fine the next day

Do you use a heart rate monitor or wearable during exercise?

A
Yes, alwaysI track heart rate on every session
B
SometimesI wear one occasionally but don't always check it
C
NoI go by feel — I don't track heart rate
Your recommended training zone

Next steps

Note: These recommendations are based on general fitness principles. Individual needs vary. If you have any cardiovascular conditions, consult a healthcare provider before starting a new training programme.

About this quiz

This quiz identifies the heart rate training zone most appropriate for your current fitness level, goals, and recovery capacity. It draws on the five-zone heart rate model used in sports science, with particular emphasis on distinguishing between Zone 2 aerobic training, polarised mixed-intensity approaches, and active recovery — the three most practically useful categories for general fitness and fat loss.

The heart rate training zones explained

Zone 1 — Active recovery (below 60% max HR)

Very light movement that promotes circulation without creating training stress. Walking, light cycling, or gentle swimming. Used on rest days to speed recovery and reduce muscle soreness without impeding the repair process.

Zone 2 — Aerobic base (60–70% max HR)

The foundation of endurance and fat-burning capacity. At this intensity, you can hold a conversation without difficulty. Zone 2 trains the aerobic energy system, increases mitochondrial density, improves fat oxidation, and is sustainable for long durations. It's the intensity that elite endurance athletes spend approximately 80% of their training time in — and the intensity most recreational exercisers spend too little time at.

Zone 3 — Tempo (70–80% max HR)

The "grey zone" — too hard to be truly aerobic, not hard enough to drive high-intensity adaptations. Research on polarised training suggests that recreational and elite athletes alike get fewer benefits from this middle zone than from combining Zone 2 with Zone 4–5 work. Most people naturally drift into Zone 3 on what should be easy days.

Zone 4–5 — Threshold and VO2max (80–100% max HR)

High-intensity work that drives cardiovascular capacity improvements, lactate threshold adaptation, and VO2max increases. Unsustainable for more than a few minutes at peak effort. Structured interval sessions (e.g. 4×4 minutes at Zone 4–5 with recovery) are the most time-efficient way to drive these adaptations.

Why most people train in the wrong zone

The most common pattern among recreational exercisers is training at moderate intensity (Zone 3) most of the time — hard enough to feel like a workout, too easy to drive meaningful adaptation. This produces a plateau in fitness improvement while also being too stressful for efficient fat oxidation.

The polarised model — 80% low intensity (Zone 2) and 20% high intensity (Zone 4–5) — is consistently supported by research as more effective than spending time in the moderate zone. It feels counterintuitive because Zone 2 sessions feel "too easy" — but the aerobic adaptations they produce are the foundation of everything else.

How to find your Zone 2 heart rate

The simplest method is the talk test: you should be able to hold a full conversation during Zone 2 without needing to pause for breath. If you can only speak in short phrases, you're in Zone 3 or higher.

For a more precise calculation, the Zone 2 calculator below uses your maximum heart rate and resting heart rate (Karvonen formula) to produce a target range.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know my maximum heart rate?

The standard estimate is 220 minus your age. This is a population average with significant individual variation — some people's true max is 10–15 bpm higher or lower. The most accurate method is a proper maximal effort test, ideally supervised.

How long should Zone 2 sessions be?

Minimum effective dose is around 30 minutes. Most benefits are seen with sessions of 45–90 minutes. Frequency matters more than session length — 3–4 Zone 2 sessions per week consistently produces more adaptation than 1–2 long sessions.

Does Zone 2 actually burn more fat than higher intensities?

Yes — in terms of the proportion of calories from fat during the session. At Zone 2, 60–70% of energy comes from fat oxidation. At Zone 4–5, the proportion from fat drops as the body relies more on glycogen. However, total calorie burn is higher at higher intensities. For improving fat metabolism as an adaptation — not just burning fat during exercise — Zone 2 is superior.

Can I do Zone 2 training by walking?

For most beginners and deconditioned individuals, brisk walking elevates heart rate into Zone 2. As fitness improves, you'll need to walk faster or jog to stay in the zone. A heart rate monitor confirms whether you're in the right range.


Related tools and articles